Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master of Science in Marketing Management
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Master of Science in Management. Redirecting (along with the other masters programs here) to the target article suggested in the AfD. I won't merge any content, but any editor can do that by pulling from the history of the redirected page. (non-admin closure) Protonk (talk) 02:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Master of Science in Marketing Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, we shouldn't have articles on every possible name and shape of a master's degree. Completely non-notable. Punkmorten (talk) 14:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —TerriersFan (talk) 18:17, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to Master of Science in Management. This would be a useful enhancement to that page. TerriersFan (talk) 18:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- given the variety of university degrees that exist, I don't think we should have articles on any except the most common ones (e.g. BA, MA, BSc, MSc, MBA, PhD, etc.) Basically, universities can and do concoct any degree names they feel like. --SJK (talk) 07:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- typically they need approval from whatever is the government or accrediting body having jurisdiction. We need some listing for things that people are likely to look up, not just the ones they already know about. Therefore,
- typically they need approval from whatever is the government or accrediting body having jurisdiction. We need some listing for things that people are likely to look up, not just the ones they already know about. Therefore,
- Merge/Redirect DGG (talk) 17:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.