Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Material Handling Equipment Distributors Association
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Material Handling Equipment Distributors Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination. The article isn't in a good state, but I'm seeing some evidence of notability after a search. Adam9007 (talk) 21:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and there is no consensus against not using speedy again since Wiki is not the same; what's else is I was actually PRODing in the meantime.... None of thid suggests any form of actual substance or notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. I do see a bunch of sources which shows that the organisation exists (for example this). However, beyond the trivial mentions, I don't see any other coverage. This is far short of the coverage required for WP:ORGDEPTH. Accordingly I will go with a delete. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.