- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Coredesat 07:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a single source and therefore fails notability guidelines; possibly original research. Previous PROD removed. MightyWarrior 22:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete At best, original research. At worst, well, I think the author is just yanking the wiki chain. I would have speedied for nonsense if I found it first. Pharmboy 00:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:NFT, WP:NEO. Listing of a "source" likely precludes A7. --Dhartung | Talk 00:46, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per G2/A7/G3/something! this is a small bit of nonsense made up one day. ~Eliz81(C) 00:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.