- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 06:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Hoax. WhiteNight T | @ | C 07:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Vanity/Hoax. -- MicahMN | μ 08:02, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Per nom.Obina 09:39, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and BJAODN. It's rather amusing.
SoothingR 10:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC) - Just plain, old-fashioned delete. Could those arguing for speedy please explain why they believe it is a candidate for speedy deletion? Note that "vanity" and "hoax" are most definitely not criteria. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:08, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, it is not a speedy that I can see either, although it was tagged as one, that's why I brought it here like the others. I think it is more of "I wish it were speedy-able" then anything else :) WhiteNight T | @ | C 21:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.