- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted (G11) by Gwen Gale. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 11:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- MatrixLloyd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable organisation. Tagged notab since June 2008, with no significant additions. 595 Google hits. This looks more like a vanity article for back links, over anything else Trident13 (talk) 00:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 01:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as blatant advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 04:52, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - Advertising Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking independent WP:RS Jclemens (talk) 06:36, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.