Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matrixx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Matrixx

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Matrixx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This entity doesn't appear to have ever been notable, and it's been stubbed for over a decade. The web site suggests it's just a marketing company now. A Google search turns up nothing. At the very least, a merge and redirect to the founder's article would work, to preserve the edit history. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia is nt supposed to be a super lightly annotated directory of the internet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:28, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article is a one-sentence stub with zero sourcing save for the company's website.TH1980 (talk) 20:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The article history shows that the original WP:SPA version did list various industry awards, which content was removed along with promotional material in 2017. However none of these appear to be inherently notable awards and searches are not finding the coverage needed to demonstrate notability. (Regarding a possible merge/redirect to the Van Vandegrift article, as mentioned in the nomination, while that may be an option, I think WP:RS sources about the depth and duration of the association would be needed before adding this into a WP:BLP.) AllyD (talk) 07:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.