Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Huttle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Criminal proceedings in the January 6 United States Capitol attack#Notable sentences. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:30, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Huttle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NCRIMINAL, his killing does not pass WP:NEVENT. Minor figure in a very large event and the killing does not make him more notable than the other ones. Not a lot here besides routine criminal proceedings. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Crime. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:35, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - passes GNG in my view. Paul Vaurie (talk) 05:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Paul Vaurie Does he pass WP:BIO1E? No. Every source is about him being killed. His killing does not pass WP:NEVENT. Do we have articles on every news story that makes the news for a few days? PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:25, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like he's notable for two events. Paul Vaurie (talk) 05:26, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul Vaurie No, because he was never reported on for the first event. All sourcing is for one event (him getting shot) PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:29, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He was mentioned in news articles about January 6th before he was shot (Google news search results), including one Newsweek article specifically about him. (I am neutral on this AfD). nhinchey (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:05, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: He received at least some coverage for his arrest: see [1]. Old Man Consequences (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's very local so I don't think it helps much. Thanks for checking though. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Criminal proceedings in the January 6 United States Capitol attack#Notable sentences, where he is already mentioned. There does not appear to be enough independent coverage of him - even the NYT source quotes his defence lawyer on his bio and health issues. RebeccaGreen (talk) 04:04, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per RebeccaGreen Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.