- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 09:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Mauricio Balter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced BLP that makes no claims of notability. JaGatalk 15:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Troutslap Nominations that mention an article as not being referenced, should indicate what efforts were made to find such sorts or give a reasonable explanation why they can't be added. - Mgm|(talk) 11:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. The problem seems to me, that even if sourced, the page is nothing more than a Resume of a non-notable person? I don't think any of it comes to even a claim of notability. He is a regular Rabbi that sits on a number of Rabbinical boards - if that is all, i say delete as non-notable.YobMod 09:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No assertion of notability. Just seems like a regular rabbi. — Jake Wartenberg 00:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's some mention in the Jewish Post over a perceived snub:[1]. That's the only non-passing coverage. Fences and windows (talk) 02:29, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.