Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maverick Framework

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Listed for 12 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:22, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maverick Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 01:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find many Fortran's coverage in the industry as of today, are you proposing to remove the history? :) Maverick was used a lot in the past (as Struts) but not now. Knocte —Preceding undated comment added 15:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]

• Keep: Sources: [1] --Odie5533 (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:21, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Odie5533 is correct, there is quite a bit of coverage of this framework. Adding proper references would be far better solution than deletion. --Tothwolf (talk) 11:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.