Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Conway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. for those who see potential. This is one where the now blocked editor didn't start from someone else's draft Star Mississippi 13:50, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Max Conway

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Max Conway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article creator has been indef blocked for repeatedly creating non-notable articles; PROD removed by an IP now blocked as a sock. This is another example of a well-written but ultimately non-notable article - young footballer who fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 17:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Rather ho-hum career as the chart filled with zeros shows. I don't see notability; sources are simple match reports. Source 14 is probably the best, but it's not enough. Oaktree b (talk) 20:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Stats sites and WP:ROUTINE coverage don't do it. TarnishedPath^talk 12:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Draft: May be WP:TOOSOON. Player now growing EFL appearances so possibly notable in the future. Paul W (talk) 16:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – The player may become notable in the medium term, but with the precedent of indiscriminate creation by a single contributor, deleting seems fair to me. Svartner (talk) 18:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep for me, sorry, but playing League Two can be enough for me, although weak, I see potential, [1], Govvy (talk) 08:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.