- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Max Sinclair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems quite promo and does not appear to have WP:SUSTAINED notability backed up with WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 17:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- How should I change it to make it less promo, please? Tomahawk Tasmania (talk) 19:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- I've made a few adjustments to the tone and added a source Tomahawk Tasmania (talk) 19:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - with zero sources it would have to be deleted speedily; with (at most) one reliable source, it’s original research. Bearian (talk) 02:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.