Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxwellian calendar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 14:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maxwellian calendar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No way this satisfies the usual inclusion criterion of WP:N. Mentioned in a couple blogs. WilyD 12:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, fails notability. TrulyBlue (talk) 12:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. WP:N and WP:MADEUP andy (talk) 13:51, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Deletember per lack of notability. Clearly, this is written by someone who is not the inventor of the calendar, but this is not the first proposal to divide the 52 weeks of the year into 13 months of four weeks each. I guess under the new calendar, today would be "Ember the 2nd", unless, of course, it isn't. In the meantime, people will have to plan their vacations the old fashioned way. Mandsford (talk) 14:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Cute idea, but not notable. Steve Dufour (talk) 14:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - WP:BOLLOCKS. dramatic (talk) 01:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wait, on second thought SPEEDY DELETE this madeup garbage. Snow is falling anyhow. JBsupreme (talk) 03:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.