Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mecha A.D.: Why Do Robots Fall in Love

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mecha A.D.: Why Do Robots Fall in Love

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK. ttonyb (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, there are more than 129,000,000 books in the world. Abductive (reasoning) 03:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note. Just pointing out that the author's page was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenier E. Marmolejos. If the article on this book is deleted, the closing admin should speedy delete Category:Novels by Jenier E. Marmolejos and Category:Mecha Chronicles novels per the C1 speedy criteria. Even if this isn't deleted those should probably be deleted, but might as well wait until the category is empty (assuming that happens) and speedy them. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 04:55, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.