Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mecha as Practical War Machines (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mecha as Practical War Machines

This article was deleted before (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mecha as Practical War Machines), I'm renominating it to be deleted again. The article was confusingly located in the Talk namespace, with a blank article page, so I moved the actual article part to the main article space. The article itself is a mess of speculation and original research, and reads like a post an anime message board, not an encylopedia article. Delete Transfinite 00:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gan fon
Delete Interesting original research (and opinion), Impossible to make into a real article. --Daniel J. Leivick 01:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:OR and speculation. also fails WP:V Jeepday 03:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and if it continues to get recreated, protect. Alex43223^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 05:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It does read like a forum post, and looks like OR — Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 05:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mechs are freaking awesome, and this 'article' is quite interesting, but it truly does not meet any article criteria, as it more of an opinion paper than a real article. I suggest the person who wrote this page save a copy, then delete. -Adun 14:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Definitely meets WP:NOT as-well as WP:OR.Telly addict^{Editor review!} 16:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is interesting, though Fundamental Dan 17:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete no possible way this could be anything other than OR ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 18:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as article recreation. ' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 22:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as OR essay.-- danntm ^T _C 22:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fascinating OR. I've saved a copy for my own interest. JoshuaZ 01:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unfortunately. Would be nice if it could be merged into the Mecha article, but that isn't really possible. I'd fully support this article existing in the future, but sadly how it now it hasn't go a single source. Probably would be better off starting from scratch. Mathmo ^Talk 05:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom.Nomen Nescio^{Gnothi seauton} 13:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As it is original research and an essay. However, I shall note that those who wish to save it, I have currently (and temporarily) userfied the page here. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 05:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.