Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meerschaum Pipes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Meerschaum. SarahStierch (talk) 01:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meerschaum Pipes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion-heavy content-fork of the much better Meerschaum. Redirect reverted by creator. WP:CSD G11 declined. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to the much better article Meerschaum, as the properly singular and properly capitalized Meerschaum pipe does. No need for such overlapping articles covering the same topic. I don't see anything in this article that's well enough sourced to be merged to the meerschaum article (the only sources cited are a commercial site, a Wikia page, and a YouTube video). "Greek", indeed! Deor (talk) 12:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would not object to a straight redirect. Mangoe (talk) 18:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.