Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meetha Raghunath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:33, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meetha Raghunath

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A biographical page of an actress fails WP:GNG and WP:ACTOR. Previously deleted as G4. Highly suspicion of COI. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. LKBT (talk) 05:50, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, India, and Tamil Nadu. LKBT (talk) 05:50, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This person is not notable. Aneirinn (talk) 20:24, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The subject's acting career is of little significance. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 04:09, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:44, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unlike the other voters, I say delete because the actress is still up-and-coming but I can't find any text interviews. She isn't "unnotable" or "insignificant", just not ready to have an article. Given her current success streak, maybe she'll ready in a year or two. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:36, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.