- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 04:58, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mega Machines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a documentary film series, not properly referenced as passing WP:NFILM. As always, films are not given an automatic notability freebie just because they exist, and must show some reliably sourced evidence of significance -- but the only notability claim even being attempted here is that this exists, and the referencing is entirely to promotional content on either Amazon.com or the self-published website of its own production studio rather than WP:GNG-worthy third party media coverage about it. It's also been flagged for notability concerns since 2013 without ever having any new secondary sources added. Bearcat (talk) 15:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 15:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.