Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megha Akash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:17, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Megha Akash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress who falls under too soon. with only 2 roles so far and neither have been released. Wgolf (talk) 01:25, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I feel reliable sources like these (and quite a few more that are available on Google) to be significant enough per BASIC: Deccan Chronicle, Times of India, Bangalore Mirror, Cinetrooth, another Deccan Chronicle. These sources have been added by me to the article now. Lourdes 14:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 02:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
comment-I was under the impression that they needed to have been in at least one film or tv show already to have a page-not where none of the films have been released. Wgolf (talk) 22:20, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That would be in case you're not referring to GNG or BIO (or BASIC)... It's not uncommon for an individual to fail NACTOR yet be qualified on GNG or BASIC. Lourdes 04:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.