Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MeisterTask

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:42, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MeisterTask (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This app is simply not notable, and the page simply lists information like one would find on the company's website. -- 2003:CD:7F10:DC00:B49D:B97C:97D2:8A01 (talk) 10:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:56, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I am not sure if ratings like this one from PC Mag count as reliable secondary sources. The Beta News source seems like it might be sponsored content. The only other mentions I see are things like "listicles", or articles with headlines like "5 apps for productivity", which do not count as reliable secondary sources with significant coverage. Accordingly, fails WP:GNG. Delete. Ikjbagl (talk) 21:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, the article fails the WP:NSOFTWARE guidelines. Ikjbagl (talk) 21:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.