Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melchizedek in the Urantia Book

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:15, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melchizedek in the Urantia Book

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A fringe theory on Melchizedek which is only attested to by fringe proponents and therefore fails our notability criterion for articles about fringe theories. (See WP:FRIND.) jps (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom, and as failing due to WP:FORK. This is the sort of article that is likely to become the repository of trivia and edit warring, which we don't need right now. Bearian (talk) 21:28, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A clear promotion of utterly non-notable fringe beliefs. No RS sources. Article fails WP:V. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I created this article in 2011, but only to remove such fringe material from the important article Melchizedek. Please note that also section Melchizedek#The Urantia Book of Article Melchizedek shall be deleted. A ntv (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.