- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep per criteria number 2 as the nomination was "unquestionably vandalism or disruption and nobody unrelated recommends deleting it". I contacted MickMacNee to ask him to elaborate on his deletion rationale and got this response.. (non-admin closure). Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Melniboné (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article contains the wikilink British Isles. Therefore, it should not exist. MickMacNee (talk) 17:01, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep WP:POINT perhaps? No valid deletion rationale provided Yoenit (talk) 19:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep If a point is being made here, it's an invalid point. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 20:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—I'll play the devil's advocate and note that it lacks the citations needed to establish notability. But that should be easy enough to fix.—RJH (talk) 22:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.