Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memex Technology Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Considering the present state of the article, I'm going to withdraw the request DGG ( talk ) 19:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Memex Technology Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no actual evidence of notability. Being adopted by one agency, however large, is not sufficient. DGG ( talk ) 21:03, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:15, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have added various newspaper articles as references. While some are primarily related to specific sales deals, the Scotsman, Independent and Herald articles provide fairly substantial content about the company. AllyD (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In addition, it isd clearly promotional , in the style of articles written by undeclared paid editors--tho it was started back in 2008. Is it worth fixing? DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.