Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memoirs of a Virus Programmer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Memoirs of a Virus Programmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page reads like an advertisement for a book from a very small publisher. Citations do not actually talk about the book or its author. TheNate (talk) 20:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 15:04, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability. I did a quick Google search and didn't come up with anything significant.JoelWhy (talk) 18:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:06, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 04:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I removed all of the worst of the article (which ended up being most of the article in general) and added the only source I could find: a Pop Matters interview/review with the author. Other than that, there is literally nothing out there that isn't a primary source, a merchant site, or an otherwise unreliable source.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:32, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Only one useable source. SL93 (talk) 22:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.