Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memory Alpha (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep, bad faith/WP:POINT nomination. NawlinWiki 23:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Three mentions in newspapers, versus many more (8 or more) for the deleted ED. And these are all simply mentions too. It also has 1300 users, whereas ED had 8000 in July 2006, and probably many more now. Fivebytwo 14:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - WP:POINT nomination. Matthew 15:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- keep as an obvious WP:POINT nomination. I think the references are adequate to indicate notability. — brighterorange (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- So are the references for ED. Fivebytwo 15:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you provide examples? Also, making a point nom. doesn't accomplish your goals. Try WP:DRV. Matthew 16:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- So are the references for ED. Fivebytwo 15:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- "ED"? — pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- He is referring to Encyclopedia Dramatica (look at logs). Matthew 16:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, watch where you WP:POINT that thing. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, per Matthew. The Wookieepedian 17:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This seriously is LESS notable than ED. ED rules, get over it. Fivebytwo 18:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:INN. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- QQ. Schrei 12:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, I mean keep. Schrei 12:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, bad faith nom by now-blocked troll. Corvus cornix 22:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.