Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memorycoin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Memorycoin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be an un-notable piece of software, yet another Bitcoin spin off. Provided sources are a link to the projects site and a forum post. A quick look on google doesn't show anything I would consider serious coverage in reliable sources. Prior disputed PROD. Dolescum (talk) 23:42, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing in Google books or Google newspapers. One hit on Google news, which simply names the coin. Article is mostly unreferenced. Unscintillating (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Also nothing in HighBeam. Though not particularly useful in determining notability, it is interesting to note that Memorycoin is not mentioned at cryptocurrency (though other cryptocurrency projects of similarly questionable notability are). Dwpaul ^Talk 00:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing WP:RS to establish WP:NOTE. Did find a mention here but only that Memorycoin was accepted as a kind of payment; we need in-depth sources.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.