- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Cirt (talk) 14:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Menarchy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is another candidate for my proposal CSD#G13: Kids writing about something that cannot be of interest to the readers of an encyclopedia. This joke is said to have gained popularity in Australia. I live in Australia and have never heard it. The term gets 3,000 Google hits but a brief review indicates that they are all misspellings of the medical term menarche. Richard Cavell (talk) 11:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unsourced, not encyclopedic. -- Jeandré, 2008-12-06t11:42z
- Delete then Redirect to menarche as plausible redirect (and to prevent recreation).--Lenticel (talk) 12:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I agree with the redirect. It's a plausible misspelling, and according to Google it is quite common. - Richard Cavell (talk) 12:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Blatantly unencyclopedic, speedy delete on the grounds of the snowball clause and/or the criterion A7 (no claim of notability) since an article about something you have invented is essentially an article about you. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In addition, the article (in the first deleted revision) originally said that the joke "... became popular in mid 2010" (i.e. admitting that it isn't actually popular). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete but there was no need to bring this to AfD, it's an obvious candidate for speedy deletion and if you tag it with that it'll go faster. —Politizer talk/contribs 14:45, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Rule #1: If you have to say it's famous, it probably isn't famous. Rule #2: If you have to say it's funny and then explain why it is funny, it probably isn't funny. Maybe you can say something funny about a minstrel show. Get it? Mandsford (talk) 16:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I recently prodded this, but the author seems to have missed the hint given by the first deletion. Icewedge (talk) 03:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.