Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merengue (software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merengue (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found zero significant coverage. This software fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 18:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as, rather clearly, fails WP:N -Rushyo Talk 18:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree that it fails WP:N. Didn't see any good sources. Millermk90 (talk) 19:57, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Clearly not notable. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 21:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources as required by WP:GNG. I dug through all the various Google searches and couldn't find a thing. It's not notable. Maybe it will be someday but Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL. Msnicki (talk) 21:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not time for this yet; all considered, it seems that it would be pretty hard to get yet another CMS in here. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as having insufficiently detailed coverage in independent third party sources. If such sources are found and integrated, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete: Lacking reliable sources to make it notable. Mattg82 (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.