Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mermaid in a Manhole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete and redirect to Za Ginipiggu. howcheng {chat} 07:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable. If they are notable, and I'm just uninformed, this should still be deleted as it is virtually empty. ParkerHiggins ^{( talk contribs )} 20:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. You know, if I ever start a band I'm just going to cut out the middle-man and call it "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion." --MisterHand 20:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • [laughs] Blackcap (talk) 18:21, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. —Preost ^talk contribs 20:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Flush. Flyboy Will 22:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete then redirect to Za Ginipiggu. It's the title of one of the films in the series. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:37, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • No need to delete it first, just create the redirect. Blackcap (talk) 18:25, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• WP:CSD A7 speedy, doesn't assert notability. Blackcap (talk) 18:21, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've tagged it as {{nn-band}}. Blackcap (talk) 18:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• After doing a wee bit more research, I'm changing my vote to redirect to Za Ginipiggu. I'm removing the speedy tag. Blackcap (talk) 18:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.