Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mersey sound wave
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete WP:CSD#G11 (advert). Thryduulf (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Mersey sound wave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No real assertion of notability. CSD and PROD both removed previously, so I thought I would take it to AfD. Mr_pand [talk | contributions] 18:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBriTalk 19:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBriTalk 19:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The speedy deletion tag was removed by the article's creator, which isn't permitted. This should have easily been speedy deleted. I didn't go to the link, but this may be a copyvio since it was written like a press release. I'm re-nominating it for speedy. freshacconci talktalk 20:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'd say this falls a fair way short of a G11 speedy, but the best claim to notability is one article in a local paper. Still looks like a promotional article to me. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.