- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Kimchi.sg 14:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Non-notable article, appears to fail WP:WEB also badly writen. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 07:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete until assertion of notability is given.--Andeh 07:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable, fails WP:WEB. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn. Haikupoet 02:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, changed to strong delete as page creator is spamming the link to other articles.--Andeh 09:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Andeh 14:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. And, I must say, the above seems like a consensus to me. Tevildo 14:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.