Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Messianic Disciple
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 18:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable, obscure terminology. No context given in article. I searched Google for a while to figure out what this is supposed to be about, but it still seems to be incomprehensible sect-speak. —Preost talk contribs 22:26, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - it says why in the article, and its pretty obviously important. See the links in the article, and look at them. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 11:29, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There is only one link in the article, and that is to Messianic Jew, which does not explain what a "Messianic Disciple" is. When it's not giving endlessly hedging definitions, this article seems to be attempting to adopt the definition of Messianic Jew, but without the "Jew" part. It seems much more like someone's pet theological phrase than a notable and distinct theological concept. In any event, it only gets 33 unique Google hits[1], and most of them seem to be part of some webring. So, even if it is "pretty important," hardly anyone's talking about it. —Preost talk contribs 14:36, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! Mo0[talk] 08:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced, I can't verify it either (ESkog)(Talk) 17:57, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Durova 04:29, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per zordrac Jcuk 18:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I see the link and I look at it, but it doesn't mention a messianic disciple. No sourced claims so it might be original research or a view of a very small group of people, which isn't identified. - Bobet 03:05, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, belongs in another article, such as Messianic Religious Practices --William Allen Simpson 09:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep and ask for sources Tobias Conradi (Talk) 12:07, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.