Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metal Composite Material
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Composite material. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:23, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Metal Composite Material (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD; I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, therefore fails general notability guidelines; when I PRODded, it only had a primary source; since then, 1 source has been added, which seems to be a passing mention in a niche-market Chinese magazine. I do not think that a verifiable article can be written on this subject. Chzz ► 20:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm not sure that an article whose title includes "MCM", and whose abstract makes it clear that it is about this subject, qualifies as a "passing mention". But, then again, it's a Chinese journal, so I suppose it's too obscure to count. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What I meant was, that the website linked has only 1 paragraph; as far as I can ascertain, that is the extent of the coverage in the reference. Chzz ► 11:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to composite materials article and those working on that article sort out what they want to include on this subject. Seems to have some notability, but I don't know if it's enough for its own article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Merge to composite materials, per WP:DGAF has good google books, news, and scholar coverage, but may not warrent its own article UltraMagnusspeak 10:13, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.