Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Methodist Bishops' Collection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Perkins School of Theology. Editors may merge material from page history where appropriate. Jujutacular ^talk 19:47, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Methodist Bishops' Collection

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable collection of writings and manuscripts by Methodist Bishops, collected by Bishop Leete. Not mentioned much other than by Leete, per Google Book search and Google scholar search. Tagged as unreferenced since February 2008. Edison (talk) 03:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:19, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:20, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. St Anselm (talk) 06:53, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone comes up with sources, in which case, merge to Perkins School of Theology, the library that now appears to hold this collection of materials. Jclemens (talk) 06:56, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect - a clear merge to Perkins School of Theology; it's in the school's Bridwell Library. Neutrality^talk 08:56, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as Neutrality. This is an archive collection. I am not qualified to judge the notability of the archive, but incorproating this paragraph in an article in the School where it is kept, or (if that article becomes too large) or a forked article on its library is by far the best solution. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:18, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.