Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metro Orange Line bicycle path

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Metro Orange Line (LACMTA). Black Kite 21:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Orange Line bicycle path

This is a procedural relist of a bundled AfD (see here for previous discussion). The original rationale (by User:JamesBurns) stated: "Wikipedia is neither a travelguide WP:NOTTRAVEL, nor a how-to manual WP:NOTMANUAL. Articles fail to establish why these paths are particularly notable. Some of the content in these also reads like opinion pieces, eg. "The Western Balboa section is frequented by soccer players and observers, which can make cycling tedious.", "The entire path is on the beach, affording beautiful views, mixed with the hazard of beachgoing pedestrians who do not respect the boundaries of the path." Tavix (talk) 20:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 23:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Appears to be notable pending improved sourcing and some clean up. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Sorry, but I think this should simply be a section in Metro Orange Line (LACMTA). I wasn't able to find any notable independent coverage of it, anyway. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Article fails to establish why it is notable. JamesBurns (talk) 09:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep Major bicycle route. A merge might be appropriate, but deletion would make the encyclopedia worse and less complete. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Duplicate !vote[reply]

Merge so that the history of this article can be preserved and brought back into existence again if it outgrows its new home as a section in Metro Orange Line (LACMTA). This article is so small that I imagine there would be no loss of important content and so a merge is as good as a keep, really. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 21:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.