- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not noteable, mentioned once in a made-for-TV movie, nothing links here, only 24 400 hits on google WLU 17:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 01:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn plus incredibly dull Josh Parris#: 01:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't seem to meet WP:CORP. MER-C 05:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - verges on spam, and CORP; and makes me want to have a metro mint (mmmm, mints). SkierRMH,07:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete My brain is slowly dying from the dullness of the artice FirefoxMan 16:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:NN a non-notable brand of a non-notable company that once employed a non-notable fictional character in a non-notable movie. TonyTheTiger 21:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable. Pathlessdesert 23:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn notable, fails WP:CORP--John Lake 16:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete - for all reasons noted above (Liveforever22 03:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.