Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolis Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While the article needs cleanup, the subject is notable. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolis Group

This looks like blatant advertising to me - and I can't see an obvious way to salvage it. However, I'm sparing it from {{db-spam}} and bringing it over for discussion, as it looks like there is potentially a notable topic buried here - possibly more so for the architecture of the building than for the company itself. I'm not sure how anything longer than a one-paragraph stub could be extracted from the current article, though, and can't see an obvious way to expand on it. – iride scent 19:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating:

Keep - A quick search through Google news brings up many articles about the work this company has done and profiles on the company itself. The article needs a clean-up but the company is definitely notable. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:29, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Panyd. Don't even know why Iridescent nominated this.--^{The Legendary}_{Sky Attacker} 22:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Highly promotional vanity article. Needs serious editing, starting with removing all the equipment lists. That's just advertising. Hairhorn (talk) 06:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We have a problem i think, this AfD is flawed because all three articles nominated for deletion: Metropolis Group, Metropolis Studios & Metropolis Mastering are linked together. Shouldn't they have been each nominated separately?? If so, then this AfD is not valid. If this issue is not going to be considered then KEEP because Metropolis is a genuine, legitimate and reputable studio. That said, I believe that the user named AndreBski is this company's meat puppet. I came to this conclusion when I caught him posting spam to the Audio_mastering article with a video made by Metropolis mastering engineers. He is also the author of all three articles about Metropolis. Clearly, this user didn't come to contribute but to promote and he does appear to be an employee of this company. So, I would merge all three into one and delete the other two. Jrod2 (talk) 12:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.