Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mezzo: Winter Edition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as non-notable. No reliable sources provided. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mezzo: Winter Edition

Speedy was declined following article's creation a year ago and don't think it's eligible a second time. Nonetheless, this is nothing but advertising, just maybe not 'blatant. So, no evidence of RS coverage and 48 ghits are: download links, forum discussions, You Tubes and other non reliable sources. No evidence that this passes WP:WEB in the slightest. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 04:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Gazimoff (talk) 13:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only reliable source found was Jay is Games, and that coverage comes to a quarter of a weekend roundup article. it's insignificant coverage and the rest are merely distribution sites or unreliable. Coverage doesn't satisfy WP:N. Someone another 16:50, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Couldn't find anything myself that I'd be happy to quote as a reliable source on this. It feels like a case of WP:WEB to me.Gazimoff (talk) 01:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article is pretty minor and reads more like an advertisement for the game than an encyclopedic entry.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

keep and fix it if you find it unfit . Pearll's sun (talk) 01:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.