Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Bateman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bateman

Contested PROD; in the PROD summary, I wrote "No evidence of notability. Main claim to fame, 'Portable media operating system', gets 5 google hits that aren't copies of this article or of the patent application." These reasons still apply. An anon editor argued on the article talk page that it should be kept, giving reasons that -- if anything -- strengthen the case for deletion. Delete. SparsityProblem 18:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this and Portable Media Operating System as well. Neither seems to have any notability at all. --Dhartung | Talk 18:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - neither shows any notability at all. Bateman clearly fails WP:BIO. The first two sources are letters written by Rob Tidwell, who's name is surprisingly similar to the creator of the article, too. The Portable Media Operating System only has 22 Google hits. Jauerback 18:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think it fails WP:BIO scope_creep 21:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom and above Weathermandan 02:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per notability assertion--Zingostar 21:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which notability assertion is that? SparsityProblem 00:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.