Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Davidson (second nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 17:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Previous nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Davidson. Renomination request by an anon at WP:AFC. Seems like good-faith, so I'm finishing it up. Kappa 18:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, in the previous afd FCYTravis said: Delete unless verifiable sources are found for the information within. Right now, it's a bunch of unsourced original research, with dubious "allegations of vote fraud" and peacockery. I concur, no sources added and that "key player" is a dubious claim. feydey 19:57, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I have provided references from the New Republic and the CNN confirming claims made in the article. Capitalistroadster 23:13, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Capitalistroadster's research. Movementarian 01:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE "Davidson became a key player in the effort to recall Governor Gray Davis," this is simply not true, unless my notions of what "key player" means are totally wrong.
- Strong Keep, Davidson is obviously a huge player in politics (he's the Executive Director of another huge youth organization) and the man has a huge successful career in front of him. He's going to be President of the United States someday, also per Capitalistroadster's research. NJPowerPlayer 01:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.