Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Voith (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Voith

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject's career doesn't seem notable. Was/Is the commander of a notable unit, however, notability is not inherited. Received a low level military award. Could not find references for him. Seems to fail WP:GNG, WP:BIO, and WP:SOLDIER. v/r - T P 21:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unsourced biography of an officer that doesn't meet WP:SOLDIER. - Ahunt (talk) 22:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: completely unreferenced BLP. AustralianRupert (talk) 22:08, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This mid-ranked officer doesn't seem likely to pass WP:BIO and the article is entirely unreferenced. Nick-D (talk) 23:29, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per AustralianRupert and NickD. Anotherclown (talk) 10:29, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.