Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michiels Drive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michiels Drive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable residential street in an unknown ___location (probably Alexandria, Louisiana) named after some non-notable immigrants. A search brings up nothing but properties for sale and similar trivial mentions. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE per nom: the person after whom the street was named appears to have been speedily deleted, and there's nothing else about the street that passes GNG. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom for the page is too trivial and for the lack of sources. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 10:50, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—fails WP:GNG. Imzadi 1979 → 14:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete absolutely no evidence of passing WP:GNG. Ajf773 (talk) 17:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG, and does not pass WP:GEOROAD (although that's a bit redundant since passing georoad would mean passing gng). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Inasmuch as this might seem like a pile-on !vote, clearly this road fails any sort of inclusion criteria. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.