Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micro-Ads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:09, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Micro-Ads

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly written, full of external links (instead of wikilinks), no refs, orphan, doesn't tell what a micro-ad actually is, just what some examples are. Not needed, dictionary definition. Plural instead of singular. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 13:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a case of WP:NEO. I do not see widespread acceptance of this term as a description of Google's ad-words. Non-notable term. Angryapathy (talk) 14:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not only a non-notable neologism, this also reads like spam from someone promoting an advertising service or consultancy, and touts the alleged innovative benefits: . What makes them attractive is the ease at which you can set up an ad and have it posted.....had the benefit of leveling the playing field for all.... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 23:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.