- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 09:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unverified information and not notable. Nothing comes up in a Google search for "David Huron" "micro-emotion" except this article. Nonpareility 20:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:V and WP:OR. No third party sources (or first party sources, actually). This Google search brings up a bunch of wikis/submission dictionaries or old links that no longer list the topic. --Wafulz 20:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: There is more information on this here. —Michael Hays 21:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. As far as I can tell, this is one professor's idea that has currency only in a course that he teaches. That said, a survey article on music and emotion might be useful here. Gazpacho 21:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- After further review, delete per Gazpacho. —Michael Hays 21:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete one-man neologism. Perhaps we can find somewhere to merge to. Just zis Guy you know? 23:05, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.