- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete under G7. — ξxplicit 07:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Micro-fates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Neologism and probable conflict of interest. No evidence that this is a notable concept. andy (talk) 07:35, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable neologism and original research: Micro-fates is a recent concept that reconciles determinism and freewill. Though there are causes for everything human beings do, the ability to see alternate possibilities allows people to choose. So, even though countless subconscious and external causes may determine why we make a choice, some people have the foresight to see the whole gambit of possibilities.... A micro-fate is therefore when an individual is guided by causes (biological, social, circumstantial, etc.) and these causes influence the decision he or she ultimately makes. I was so hoping for tiny, tiny versions of Clotho, Lachesis, and Atropos to appear nere. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. NN and NEO. CRGreathouse (t | c) 02:39, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable neologism per WP:NEO, self-referenced per WP:SELFPUB. Latest in a series of self-promotional pages and edits: see creator's talk page. Empty Buffer (talk) 12:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.