- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 04:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- MicroSave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:CORP. The entire article is very promotional in tone, and none of the material is sourced to anything. I have not been able to find any coverage myself either. Reyk YO! 06:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as G11, unambiguous advertisement.--Talain (talk) 21:57, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Spam. The article's notability problem can be summed up by the second sentence: "MicroSave’s studies are allegedly referenced to in much of the leading literature on microfinance [citation needed]." ALLEGEDLY referenced to? Outta here. --MelanieN (talk) 01:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.