Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microclimates in Sydney
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Microclimates in Sydney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced original research, no secondary sources. Nerdluck34 (talk) 06:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 02:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree with the nom that the article is entirely original research. Jenks24 (talk) 13:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agreed with nom. Orderinchaos 19:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Interesting topic for an article, but this would probably require a total re-write given the lack of supporting evidence. Nick-D (talk) 23:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.