Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microgen Aptitude

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:35, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Microgen Aptitude (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. The only fact that is sourced is that a company has chosen to use this software. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not all software needs to be documented on Wikipedia. Looking at the edit log, this is clearly advertising. Much of the POV text has been removed, which has improved the article substantially. But it remains that this is the remnants of an article that was clearly an ad posing as a Wikipedia article. The two major editors User:Rosschap and User:Tma uk have only made edits on this article, uploaded a microgen logo image and made links on other articles to this article. And both have been warned regarding the removal of speedy deletion tags for this page. Looking at the article in its current state, it is a stub at best and provides almost no information on the software. I think the only question regarding this article is whether it should be deleted as a result of this AfD or speedily deleted under G11.--Carbon Rodney 12:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No indication of notability. Created and edited by User:Rosschap and User:Tma uk who as the above comment states are both SPA's. User:Rosschap also created the Microgen page which was speedy deleted as Spam. This page was nominated for Speedy deletion but the tag was removed by User:Tma uk so clearly working together on this. Vrenator ^talk 12:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete, unambiguous advertising and patent nonsense. Another software package designed to help development teams design, implement and control enterprise applications advertising on Wikipedia. That product description is deliberately meaningless and evasive as well. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.