Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MidiNameDocument

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 06:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MidiNameDocument (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. When I PROD'd this, the single source was not independent. It was de-PROD'd by the creator, who added two more, one being simply a self-published list of MIDNAMs the website owner has collected over the years (not reliable or substantive coverage), and the other being an entry in a directory of filetypes (maybe reliable, but not the kind of substantive coverage that indicates notability). In any case, even if we take that last source to be suitable, that's still only one, and we can't hang a GNG pass on one source. ♠PMC(talk) 00:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 00:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 00:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.