- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Mihai Radu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sounds important, perhaps, but the lack of multiple independent sources covering the subject's life and work in depth indicates non-notability. Biruitorul Talk 18:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete insufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Google searches brought up nothing.--Patton123 (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete indeed. By the looks of it, non-notable and self-promotional. Dahn (talk) 04:00, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.