Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Slocombe (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G4/G5/A7). Article also salted to prevent recreation by new users. –MuZemike 01:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Slocombe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted via afd about a year ago. Recreated version reeked of self-promotion/advertising, was mostly stripped of that; notability still borderline. A few media mentions, but most mentions are either trivial or from non-notable sources. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - deleted before for lack of notability, no evidence of any significant new coverage or achievements. Warofdreams talk 10:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - previously gone through AfD twice and been deleted. Seems to have been created as a spill over from edit wars Urban 75 article to push pov. Versions of the article have really significant BLP issues as well - related to the pov push. Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete created by a now banned sock puppet who had an agenda. --Pontificalibus (talk) 14:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.